Using new (and old) technologies

This is one of a series of research projects in which colleagues and I have experimented with ways of engaging the community in building shared knowledge/understandings. We have had varying levels of success, and we have tried to work out what works well.

For example, in 2011 I published this paper, in which two initiatives were compared, together with my colleague, Jocelyn Wishart. In the abstract we say that:  … in both, there were fewer contributions than anticipated and the quality of a large proportion of the contributions was disappointing. 

In a similar paper, published here, I also looked at an initiative that involved a research community. Once again, the paper concludes that ‘…the pattern of contributions can be described as ‘scattergun’ and although there were some exceptions, generally discussion not sustained and contributions were not very substantive’ (p 433)

In this project, I am attempting to build on some of the lessons learnt both within my own research and from the literature.  One of my key challenges is to get people to contribute to the discussion, and this is much more difficult than one might think. One thing I am trying is to keep the entry-threshold relatively low (i.e. I am not asking people to read too much before they can engage). The risk of this strategy, however, is over-simplification of complex and difficult ideas.

2 Responses to Using new (and old) technologies

  1. The question of old and new technology also pops up in a different context, vocational education,. See for example the question how students should learn to measure as part of future occupations: Bakker, A., Wijers, M., Jonker, V., & Akkerman, S. F. (2011). The use, nature and purposes of measurement in intermediate-level occupations. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(5), 737-746. DOI 10.1007/s11858-011-0328-3 Open access.
    Teachers often use old technology first so that students come to understand what new technology is doing for them.

  2. Marie says:

    Thanks, Arthur.
    The paper Arthur refers to can be found here:
    http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11858-011-0328-3

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s